Moving the issuer's state into Postgres removed the last thing that tied
either app to one hosting provider. What was left was a deployment tool
describing resources that no longer existed — so this replaces it with
`wrangler`, which is what actually deploys a Worker, and adds a second way
to run each app that involves no provider at all.
Each app now has a `wrangler.jsonc` with an environment per stage, and a
`Dockerfile` beside it. The handler is the same one in both cases; what
differs is only where its settings come from. Two of them gained a second
spelling so that nothing has to branch on the runtime: Postgres arrives as
a pooled binding or as `DATABASE_URL`, and the route to the issuer is a
service binding or `AUTH_INTERNAL_URL`.
That last one is new, and it is a split the binding was already making
without saying so. `AUTH_ISSUER_URL` has to be the issuer's public name,
because it is compared literally against every token's `iss` claim — but
the public name is often not routable from inside a deployment. So the
name and the route are two settings now rather than one that cannot be
both.
DNS moves out of code and into `docs/dns.md`, which lists every hostname
and what it is for. Six records that change roughly never did not need a
tool, and the table outlives whatever is answering the names — which is
the point, since some of them will stop being Workers. The sandbox
hostnames are hyphenated rather than nested for the same reason: a
certificate covering `*.nestri.io` covers one label and not two, so
`api-sandbox.nestri.io` can become an ordinary origin later without a
certificate having to be ordered for it first.
Also drops `EMAIL_DEV_LOG` from committed configuration into `.dev.vars`,
which `wrangler deploy` cannot upload. Printing a live sign-in code to a
log should not be one forgotten override away from production.
Squashes the current state of the internal working tree onto this history.
The two trees had grown apart with no common ancestor, so this is a content
sync rather than a merge, and the published history is preserved rather than
rewritten — a force-push here would break every existing fork and clone to no
benefit.
What lands:
- Waitlist: API route, core module, and migration 0006 alongside game aliases.
- User verification.
- CI, oxfmt config, editor settings.
- Assorted fixes across the API routes and core modules.
The repository's own README, the wordmark and the per-package READMEs are kept
from this side; the internal tree had dropped them and they are what a stranger
arriving here reads first.
The marketing site in the internal tree is deliberately not here. It is a
separate product with its own repo and its own licence, and this repo is the
open one — a closed component does not belong in it regardless of how convenient
the directory looked.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Description
- [x] Adds support for AWS SSO, which makes us (the team) able to use
SST and update the components independently
- [x] Splits the webpage into the landing page (Qwik), and Astro (the
console) in charge of playing. This allows us to pass in Environment
Variables to the console
- ~Migrates the docs from Nuxt to Nextjs, and connects them to SST. This
allows us to use Fumadocs _citation needed_ that's much more beautiful,
and supports OpenApi~
- Cloudflare pages with github integration is not working on our new CF
account. So we will have to push the pages deployment manually with
Github actions
- [x] Moves the current set up from my personal CF and AWS accounts to
dedicated Nestri accounts -
## Related Issues
<!-- List any related issues (e.g., "Closes #123", "Fixes #456") -->
## Type of Change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that changes existing
functionality)
- [x] Documentation update
- [ ] Other (please describe):
## Checklist
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] My code follows the project's coding style
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings/errors
## Notes for Reviewers
<!-- Point out areas you'd like reviewers to focus on, questions you
have, or decisions that need discussion -->
Please approve my PR 🥹
## Screenshots/Demo
<!-- If applicable, add screenshots or a GIF demo of your changes
(especially for UI changes) -->
## Additional Context
<!-- Add any other context about the pull request here -->
