A six-digit code has a million values, and nothing was counting how many
of them a caller tried. The code travelled in an encrypted cookie the
caller held, verification compared against that cookie, and a wrong
answer simply re-rendered the form. Nobody has to be the person the code
was mailed to: type somebody else's address into the first screen and the
code goes to their mailbox while the cookie stays with you. At that point
the only thing between a stranger and an account is a million requests,
and the constant-time comparison protecting the code was guarding a door
you could just keep knocking on.
Guesses are now counted on the server, under a name that changes with
every code. That placement is the point: a counter kept beside the code,
in the cookie, is a counter the guesser can wind back by replaying an
older copy. Starting over is still allowed and still costs a fresh code
sent to the mailbox being aimed at, which is where somebody notices. A
correct code spends its record too, so its remaining guesses do not carry
into the next one.
The cookie also lived for twenty-four hours, which made the pin a
password with a million possible values and a day to try them. Ten
minutes now, and the code stops being accepted when the clock says so
rather than when the cookie happens to go away.
Resend had no limit either, so the button was a way to mail a stranger as
fast as requests go out. Codes to one address are spaced, and one attempt
at signing in can only ask for so many.
Both refusals say the same thing on purpose. Which of the two it was is a
fact about somebody else's mailbox.
Signing in with a gaming account or with an SSH key could both bring a
user into existence. That makes an account only as recoverable as the
thing that created it, and gives one person as many accounts as they
have gaming logins — neither of which is what an account is supposed to
be now that verifying an address is what creates one.
Both are unwired rather than deleted. The provider implementations stay
where they are, because connecting a gaming account is still something
this product does; it just does it from the API, against a user who
already exists, which is a connection hanging off an identity rather
than an identity of its own.
The worker test followed: it exercised the two flows that are gone, and
now covers the one that is left plus an assertion that the other two are
not routed, so they cannot come back quietly.
