Files
tradingagents/tradingagents/agents/managers/portfolio_manager.py
Yijia-Xiao d7b40a2a5c fix(graph): resolve instrument identity to stop wrong-company hallucination
Agents had no ground-truth ticker→company mapping, so the market analyst
could pattern-match a price chart to the wrong company (e.g. TOTDY read as
"TotalEnergies"), and every downstream agent inherited the bad framing.

Resolve identity once at run start via a cached, fail-open yfinance lookup
and inject company/sector/exchange into the shared instrument context that
all twelve agents consume, with an explicit do-not-substitute instruction.
Resolution runs on both the propagate() and CLI entry points.

Also replaces the bare "Continue" message-clear placeholder, which some
OpenAI-compatible providers interpreted as the user task, with a
context-anchored placeholder carrying the resolved identity and date.

#814 #888
2026-05-30 23:56:32 +00:00

93 lines
3.3 KiB
Python

"""Portfolio Manager: synthesises the risk-analyst debate into the final decision.
Uses LangChain's ``with_structured_output`` so the LLM produces a typed
``PortfolioDecision`` directly, in a single call. The result is rendered
back to markdown for storage in ``final_trade_decision`` so memory log,
CLI display, and saved reports continue to consume the same shape they do
today. When a provider does not expose structured output, the agent falls
back gracefully to free-text generation.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from tradingagents.agents.schemas import PortfolioDecision, render_pm_decision
from tradingagents.agents.utils.agent_utils import (
get_instrument_context_from_state,
get_language_instruction,
)
from tradingagents.agents.utils.structured import (
bind_structured,
invoke_structured_or_freetext,
)
def create_portfolio_manager(llm):
structured_llm = bind_structured(llm, PortfolioDecision, "Portfolio Manager")
def portfolio_manager_node(state) -> dict:
instrument_context = get_instrument_context_from_state(state)
history = state["risk_debate_state"]["history"]
risk_debate_state = state["risk_debate_state"]
research_plan = state["investment_plan"]
trader_plan = state["trader_investment_plan"]
past_context = state.get("past_context", "")
lessons_line = (
f"- Lessons from prior decisions and outcomes:\n{past_context}\n"
if past_context
else ""
)
prompt = f"""As the Portfolio Manager, synthesize the risk analysts' debate and deliver the final trading decision.
{instrument_context}
---
**Rating Scale** (use exactly one):
- **Buy**: Strong conviction to enter or add to position
- **Overweight**: Favorable outlook, gradually increase exposure
- **Hold**: Maintain current position, no action needed
- **Underweight**: Reduce exposure, take partial profits
- **Sell**: Exit position or avoid entry
**Context:**
- Research Manager's investment plan: **{research_plan}**
- Trader's transaction proposal: **{trader_plan}**
{lessons_line}
**Risk Analysts Debate History:**
{history}
---
Be decisive and ground every conclusion in specific evidence from the analysts.{get_language_instruction()}"""
final_trade_decision = invoke_structured_or_freetext(
structured_llm,
llm,
prompt,
render_pm_decision,
"Portfolio Manager",
)
new_risk_debate_state = {
"judge_decision": final_trade_decision,
"history": risk_debate_state["history"],
"aggressive_history": risk_debate_state["aggressive_history"],
"conservative_history": risk_debate_state["conservative_history"],
"neutral_history": risk_debate_state["neutral_history"],
"latest_speaker": "Judge",
"current_aggressive_response": risk_debate_state["current_aggressive_response"],
"current_conservative_response": risk_debate_state["current_conservative_response"],
"current_neutral_response": risk_debate_state["current_neutral_response"],
"count": risk_debate_state["count"],
}
return {
"risk_debate_state": new_risk_debate_state,
"final_trade_decision": final_trade_decision,
}
return portfolio_manager_node