Files
netris-nestri/docs/deploy.md
Wanjohi 15631f5d25 feat(core,api): an organisation owns hardware, and a domain says who belongs
Two kinds of machine were modelled as one. A host somebody brings is theirs,
reached through a team, and should die with their account. A host bought to
serve other people's workloads is none of those things — and there was nowhere
to put it, so it had to be registered under an employee's personal team, where
it was that person's property and their account going away took it with them.

Ownership becomes an either/or. A machine names a team or an organisation,
exactly one, enforced by a check constraint rather than by convention: both
null is a host nothing can bill, and both set is two answers to "whose is
this?" where whichever join a query happens to take decides who pays. Hardware
an organisation owns has no team and no person at all, which is the point.

The organisation is deliberately not a billing subject and has no plan columns.
It says who owns the metal; a team pays for what it uses either way.

Membership is derived from a verified email domain rather than stored. An
address is already the root identity, so a second record of who belongs where
is a second answer that can disagree with the first — and deriving it means
signing in with a personal address still gets an ordinary personal account,
which is what lets one person hold a company account and use the consumer
product. Nothing is granted on an unverified domain or an unverified address:
either one is a string somebody typed.

Entitlement on fleet hardware refuses everyone for now, with a reason that says
so. What grants a run on metered hardware is a plan, and there is nothing to
ask yet, so it fails closed rather than giving the expensive case away. The
branch is written out so the plan check has one obvious place to land.

Routes are read-only, and nothing seeds an organisation. Creating one grants
membership to everyone who can receive mail at a domain, so it is an operator
action against the database — a migration that inserted one would insert it
into every deployment, including ones we have nothing to do with. See
docs/deploy.md.
2026-09-18 23:16:07 +03:00

189 lines
7.8 KiB
Markdown

# Deploying the control plane
Two apps — [`apps/api`](../apps/api) and [`apps/auth`](../apps/auth) — and two
ways to run each of them. There is one handler per app and it is the same
handler both ways: a function from a request to a response, holding no opinion
about what is calling it.
| | |
| --- | --- |
| **Cloudflare Workers**, via `wrangler` | what production and sandbox are today |
| **A container**, via the `Dockerfile` in each app | what a self-hoster runs, and where this is going |
Settings arrive as bindings in the first case and as environment variables in
the second, and `@nestri/core`'s `Env` resolves the two into one shape — so
`HYPERDRIVE` and `DATABASE_URL` are two spellings of the database, and an
`AUTH` service binding and `AUTH_INTERNAL_URL` are two spellings of the route
to the issuer. Nothing in either app branches on which it got.
Hostnames, and why they are shaped the way they are: [`dns.md`](dns.md).
## Locally
Three ways, in increasing order of how much they resemble a deployment.
```sh
cp .env.example .env # once; compose has no credentials of its own
docker compose up postgres # the database, for either of the next two
bun dev # both apps under the Workers runtime
bun run dev:server # both apps as plain processes
docker compose up --build # both apps as containers, plus the database
```
`bun dev` runs two `wrangler dev` sessions, on ports 1337 and 3000. They find
each other through wrangler's local registry, so the API reaches the issuer
over the same service binding it uses in production rather than over the
network — which is the point of running it this way. Neither needs a
Cloudflare account: the Hyperdrive binding falls back to
`localConnectionString`, which is the compose database.
Settings that exist only locally live in `apps/auth/.dev.vars` rather than in
`vars`. `wrangler dev` reads that file and `wrangler deploy` cannot upload it,
which is the guarantee wanted for the one setting in it — the one that prints
sign-in codes to the log.
`docker compose` here is Docker's plugin or `podman-compose`; both read the
file unchanged.
Migrations are never run for you, in any of the three:
```sh
bun run db:migrate # against DATABASE_URL
```
## Cloudflare Workers
Configuration is [`apps/auth/wrangler.jsonc`](../apps/auth/wrangler.jsonc) and
[`apps/api/wrangler.jsonc`](../apps/api/wrangler.jsonc). Each has two named
environments, `sandbox` and `production`, plus an unnamed default that is the
local one.
Wrangler's named environments do **not** inherit bindings from the top level —
`vars`, `services` and `hyperdrive` are repeated in each on purpose, and a
setting added to one environment and not the other is a silent hole rather than
an error.
### One-time setup
```sh
bunx wrangler login
# Once per database. Prints an id; paste it into both wrangler.jsonc files,
# replacing the placeholder for that environment.
bunx wrangler hyperdrive create nestri-production --connection-string "postgres://…"
bunx wrangler hyperdrive create nestri-sandbox --connection-string "postgres://…"
```
Hyperdrive is a connection pool in front of Postgres, and it is there because
each Worker isolate would otherwise open a connection of its own — which
Postgres answers, at some point in a busy hour, with *"sorry, too many clients
already"*. A container has one pool per process and needs none of this.
### Secrets
Set per app and per environment, and held by Cloudflare rather than by this
repository:
```sh
cd apps/auth
bunx wrangler secret put EMAIL_SEND_URL --env production
bunx wrangler secret put EMAIL_API_KEY --env production
bunx wrangler secret put EMAIL_FROM --env production
```
The API has no secrets of its own to put here: every caller it accepts proves
who it is — a session token from the issuer, a personal access token, or a
registered host's own credentials — so there is nothing shared to leak.
The issuer refuses to send a sign-in code with its mail settings half
configured or absent, rather than falling back to printing codes to the log —
so a deployment that forgets these fails at the first sign-in attempt with a
message naming what is missing, instead of quietly logging usable codes.
### Deploying
```sh
bun run deploy:sandbox
bun run deploy:production
```
Both deploy the issuer first and the API second, because the API's `AUTH`
binding names a script that has to exist. The custom domains in the config are
what create the DNS records — there is no separate step, and no separate tool
holding the other half of that fact.
## Organisations, and why none are created for you
An organisation owns hardware outright — a host that serves other people's
workloads rather than its registrant's — and gathers the teams whose members
sign in with its email domain. Membership is derived from that domain, so the
`domain_verified` flag is the whole of the access decision: an address on a
verified domain *is* membership, and nothing grants anything on an unverified
one.
**Nothing seeds one, deliberately, and it must stay that way.** A migration
that inserted a row here would insert it into every deployment, including
somebody else's — handing every account on that domain membership of a
deployment its owners have nothing to do with. Seeding business data is what
makes a schema migration a back door.
So it is an operator action, run once against the database, by whoever is
allowed to decide that a domain is really theirs:
```sql
INSERT INTO organisation (id, name, slug, domain, domain_verified)
VALUES (
'org_' || substr(replace(gen_random_uuid()::text, '-', ''), 1, 26),
'Example',
'example',
'example.com',
true
);
```
Two things to get right, because nothing checks them for you. The domain is
lower-cased and has no `@` — it is compared literally against the domain half
of an address. And `domain_verified` should be `true` only for a domain you
control: everyone who can receive mail at it becomes a member the next time
they sign in, with no further step.
Hardware is then registered to it by a member, with `organisationId` instead of
a team on `POST /machine/register`. Such a host has no owner and no team, which
is the point — it outlives the account of whoever ran the command.
## Containers
```sh
docker build -f apps/api/Dockerfile -t nestri-api .
docker build -f apps/auth/Dockerfile -t nestri-auth .
```
The context is the repository root in both cases: the lockfile and the two
shared packages are there, and a context rooted at the app directory could not
reach them. Both use the repository-wide `.dockerignore`; only the guest rootfs
build has one of its own, as `build/Dockerfile.dockerignore` — a
`<Dockerfile>.dockerignore` **replaces** the repository-wide file rather than
adding to it, which is worth knowing before writing a third.
Both images are stateless and hold no configuration. What they need:
| | `auth` | `api` |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `DATABASE_URL` | required | required |
| `AUTH_ISSUER_URL` | — | required, the issuer's **public** URL |
| `AUTH_INTERNAL_URL` | — | only if that URL is unroutable from here |
| `EMAIL_SEND_URL` `EMAIL_API_KEY` `EMAIL_FROM` | all three, or none | — |
| `EMAIL_DEV_LOG` | `true` prints codes instead of sending | — |
| `PORT` | default `1337` | default `3000` |
[`docker-compose.yml`](../docker-compose.yml) at the root wires all of it
together with a Postgres, and is the smallest complete answer to *"how do I run
this myself"*.
Neither image terminates TLS or serves a certificate, and neither marks the
cookies it sets `Secure`, because both expect to sit behind something that does
terminate TLS. So put a reverse proxy in front of them and keep the origin
unreachable except through it — `docker-compose.yml` publishes their ports on
loopback only for exactly this reason, and changing that to `0.0.0.0` is a way
to reach the issuer *around* the proxy with codes and tokens in clear text.